Thanks for logging in.

You can now click/tap WATCH to start the live stream.

Thanks for logging in.

You can now click/tap LISTEN to start the live stream.

Thanks for logging in.

You can now click/tap LATEST NEWS to start the live stream.

LISTEN
Watch
on air now

Create a 4BC account today!

You can now log in once to listen live, watch live, join competitions, enjoy exclusive 4BC content and other benefits.


Joining is free and easy.

You will soon need to register to keep streaming 4BC online. Register an account or skip for now to do it later.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Reinstating speed camera warning signs provokes strong debate

David Berthon

A few weeks back the Chair of the National Trauma Committee of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Dr John Crozier, was highly critical of the Government move to reinstate warning signs for mobile speed cameras, suggesting it was populist politics.

Whilst I respect the good Doctors view and the fact that he witnesses terrible road trauma I don’t agree with his suggestion that it would lead to an extra 32 roads deaths a year based on Government modelling.

Sending a driver a speeding infringement some weeks after they’ve been camera’d on a straight section of road with no accident history for doing six to seven k’s over the limit does little in my view for road safety.

It doesn’t target the small percentage of red neck driver’s, many drug and alcohol affected, who throw caution to the wind on a daily basis and who get off with relatively light penalties.

I’m David Berthon.

Click PLAY to listen!

Download this podcast here

David Berthon
Advertisement