Welcome to 4BC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Section Navigation, Content.

4BC - Fairfax Radio Network

Tuesday February 9, 2010

What we're talking about

  • RICK on Justice for a Killer Queensland-style WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM A SOFT WEAK GOVERNMENT.SOFT AND WEAK CAMERON  DICK.THIS REALLY DOES SEND THE WRONG MESSAGE TO ... more
  • brent on Justice for police the police no longer serve the people they are just pupets of the bligh circuc with top appointments by her and funding ... more
  • Jennifer Nash on Barnaby Joyce You are correct Leonard our Constitution mentioned no political parties, only representatives of the people. Which political ... more
  • Stephen on Barnaby Joyce Tony Abbott cannot allow Barnaby Joyce to expose the economic weakness of the Liberal front bench. Joyce should be moved to ... more
  • Jennifer Nash on Justice for police True Michael, you are a very big police supporter, however, even you will not and cannot defend the indefensible. We need a ... more
  • LEONARD CLAMPETT on Barnaby Joyce Micheal, Regarding your interview with BARNABY JOYCE. I wasamused to hear the bleating of varous people who complained that ... more
  • Simon on Barnaby Joyce I could not access the interview over the weekend so this is my first listen to it. Boy, what a different man. He has been ... more
  • Wobblyone on Barnaby Joyce Barnaby is something that we should all cherish and hope like hell that we don't lose. Fancy having an honest, straight from ... more
  • Andrew Green on Justice for police There seems to be a culture of police officers being above the law. This starts at the top and works it's way down. I was of ... more
  • joy on Taxpayer-funded Rudd Rubbish KRUDD - WITH ALL OF HIS SINCERITY (LAUGH LAUGH LAUGH) PROTESTS. THIS IS THE SAME GUTLESS WONDER THAT IS SELLING AUSTRALIA ... more
  • joy on Paying the Taliban your money Hello Mr Taliban, because yellow belly rudd has given you all this money can i please stop paying for illegal immigrants to ... more
  • Paul Rogers on Justice for police Hi Michael, If you really want to know what is going on then I suggest that you read the email I sent to Greg. I wrote it ... more
  • Dave on Phantom ETS jobs Do you really believe that a TAX will stop climate change. If so can I interest you in a bridge? A TAX will not make one ... more
  • Sylvia Buxton on Barnaby Joyce I admire Barnaby so much, he will be a great asset. I know this can't happen yet but in the future I would like to see him ... more
  • Anne Scott on Barnaby Joyce Now Smithy, I'm nearly as big a fan of yours as Barnaby (but not quite!) and I reckon you were a bit rugged in that ... more
  • Lewis Hoffman on Barnaby Joyce I have emailed B arnaby this morning to see if he can get a list of countries we supply overseas aid to and how much to we ... more
  • Albert on More on the Sustainability Declaration The $1,500 now $1,200 subsidy for ceiling insulation (some imported) will be recovered. Nothing is free. Reported on the ... more
  • Lewis Hoffman on The Transport Minister Oh yes, some mums do have 'em. I think maybe you're right , some close relation to our own hereKeep up the good work more
  • Albert on The Transport Minister This clip also looks like the Premier doing the due diligence for the A1GP for the Gold Coast. I don't understand why people ... more
  • RICK on Taxpayer-funded Rudd Rubbish its the same shit that comes out of his uncles mouth and we poor tax payers cop it.why has the coalition not made a song and ... more

Wages Breakout

Posted by: Michael Smith | 1 July, 2009 - 12:51 PM
amwu

The Australian Manufacturing Worker’s Union has held off its pay claims until now - 1 July, the start of the new Rudd Government’s Fair Work Act.

The AMWU is after at least a 4% rise for all its members and 6% for workers in 'businesses that can afford it.'

What about the businesses that can’t afford 4%?

The new system is designed to encourage collective bargaining. And unions will have the right of entry to workplaces to inspect the salary records of employees.

If the AMWU is successful in its move, there’s no doubt other unions will follow. And that will result in rises way beyond inflation - without any gains in productivity.

It’s very important that we understand what this is all about. Increased pay that follows increased output from the company is good. Increased pay that doesn’t come from increased economic output is bad.

A wages breakout will lead to inflation and misery.

I’ll get some expert analysis this afternoon.

Blog comments Your Say

  • Gayle,
    As the online poll on the AMWU website overwhelmingly indicates, the most important issue for employees at this point in time is job security. A union has a responsibility, as the representative of the employees, to seek the optimum wage outcome without threatening job security. Unions, too, recognise that if a business collapses, the employees lose their jobs. It's a bit of a balancing act.
    However, it does seem that some (not all) employers feel no sense of responsibility for the well being of their employees. They'll contract work out to cheap foreign labour or exploit visa regulations, shutting out Australian workers while maintaining huge profits.
    Gayle, I applaud you for your attitude towards your employees. You appear to treat your workers as assets rather than liabilities. It's a shame that some businesses, particularly some of our larger enterprises, refuse to do the same, no matter what the economic landscape.

    bigfella Wednesday 1 July, 2009 - 8:58 PM

  • Like Julie Gillard I too was born in Wales and migrated here in 1966.
    My father was a union man both in Wales and Australia and while I agree that both employees and employers need a fair go unfortunately I cannot see that current day unions like Politicians can differentiate between the two.
    Having seen Unions take hard stands in Wales that caused considerable grief to both the families of the miners and the miners themselves and having seen these families go without wages for weeks on end I can only hope that all unions today look at both sides.
    The end result of union actions in Wales resulted in the mines being closed because they became unprofitable, parts of Wales still haven't recovered 40 years later, this was due in part to the greed and ignorance or perhaps one sided views of union officials
    As an employer I fully understand the need to be fair to our employees all of mine I regard as friends who are to be appreciated rather than exploited and can only hope that the majority of employers do the same because without people working with us we have no business, however if the unions push us as employers to the extent that we make no profit then there will be no position to offer.
    Like bigfella who's attitude I must admit I rarely agree with, and I can tell you now our business books are run from my home and there will be no way that I will open my home to any union rep that decides that he wants to see those books.

    Gayle Wednesday 1 July, 2009 - 5:28 PM

  • Three questions...
    Where can I find the phrase "businesses that can afford it"? I am having trouble finding this quote attributed to the AMWU. Perhaps someone can enlighten me.
    Secondly, is this part of the EB process? EB stands for Enterprise Bargaining. I've always understood that to mean the employer and the employees' representative (the relevant Union) negotiating changes to working conditions and productivity improvements that benefit both employer and employees. Why do you presume that there will be no gains in productivity?
    Thirdly, who is Aaron O'Brien?

    bigfella Wednesday 1 July, 2009 - 2:10 PM

Post a comment * Mandatory fields